I'm at the same time very rational and very open minded to anything, so for 20 years I've listened to any
kind of cooks pretending to see the future, speak to higher realm or guardian angels etc.
My conclusion is that they are all 100% scammers and/or delusional.
For me to believe in one of them I just need only one thing : predict accurately a world event in advance, and
that basically never occurs.
The rare times it happened (e.g. the Trump assassination prediction), a background check quickly reveals
that the guy has been making 10s of predictions in each video for years, so one of them actually happening is really
not statistically relevant.
Before you jump at me as a lost cause materialist, if you want to convince me otherwise that's very easy : Find me
someone you accurately predicted 911 or C19 (by supernatural way I mean, not insider info or just deduction based on facts).
PS : Add Clif High to the scammers/delusional, he is wrong 99% of the time.
https://www.windbridge.org/are-all-mediums-frauds/
The truth is out there, and your requirement for "proof" being "predict accurately a world event in advance" is pretty nebulous and open to interpretation, who is deciding a prediction is "accurate"? You? Its subject to your personal confirmation bias? When a person is predicting future events, what percentage of accuracy is required to prove they aren't fraudulent? 100%, 90%, 80%, 75%, 55%. Steph Curry is currently the best free throw shooter in the nba at 90%. The worst In history is Ben Wallace at 41%. Is Wallace a fraudulent NBA professional? Is Curry? The best remote viewers documented have about a 63% hit rate. Does the 37% Innacuracy make them fraudulent? I think the best advice I have for you is try developing these techniques yourself. It may be your best, direct experience.
Sport statistics has nothing to do with this. Those are just a calculation of how often you can repeat the perfect move you trained your all life for.
And no, I should not have to learn those techniques myself, in the same way I don't need to learn mechanics or medicine or tax evasion techniques, because just by using those services and word of mouth I can identity better mechanics or doctors who have demonstrated a better accuracy than their colleagues.
Let me also comment on the fact you didn't provide a name for a good medium than you could recommend, but I'm sure you could recommend a good mechanic to me.
@ronin Did you visit the link? Read Dr. Beischel's research results? Marisa Ryan is the name of a medium certified through Windbridge, you could use her as an example. You still haven't defined the parameters for "predict accurately a world event in advance." As an aside mediums generally aren't consulted.for predictive purposes anyway, also, if prediction of the future events accurately is the benchmark that implies that the future is in a permanently fixed state down to minute levels? That really opens up a complex discussion of the nature of time and space, and I am not adequately equipped.to posit a satisfactory explanation for how time operates but that is worth examining when thinking about how accurately one could theoretically predict a future event doesn't it? Anyway, resistance to first hand exploration of psi abilities is interesting, sure you should have a good mechanic, but also learn how to change a tire, obviously having a trusted medical professional in your life is advisable but so is knowing how to treat yourself for any number of common health complaints. I'm pretty sure Judith.Hill (the astrologer) did a pretty good job of predicting c19 I just don't think she put it out on YouTube because I imagine she was too busy with her practice but you'd have to ask her. Sadly, YouTube, social media, and the like may not be the place for you to find the "authentic" version of what your looking for. The works of Swedenborg, Cayce, and Kardec are fascinating though, oh wait, they get thrown out defacto because they're historically figures and what do we have to learn from history anway. Nothing like moving the goal post when it suits your argument, alas maybe one day Alex Jones will admit that he's not a muggle and God spoke to him about 9/11 and we'll finally have proof of the psi phenomena. Until then, consider giving it a go yourself, I mean if it's all fake anyway where is the danger?
@ronin What about when John Dee apparently predicted the death of Sir Philip Sidney?
@thecarlwood I can connect John Dee to a Shakespeare candidate, namely Sidney, whose family is all over the publication of the Shakespeare folio, but, I'm still partial to what's called "Group Theory", which was hot before everyone thought it was solo author again.
I just wrapped up my 2nd interview with JMG, as he is translating for us John Dee's Latin horoscope for Sidney as we speak. I had to pay Oxford Uni few hundred bucks to get scans of it.
Should have good conspiracy juice.
Shakespeare is undoubtedly tied in with Sidney family, let alone a host of other candidates that need to be connected beyond "Bacon muh spycraft".
https://youtu.be/JTi9awgC-VY?si=fBkjo7myebqxpxsX
Sadly, JMG wasn't impressed by Bard Code pitch but I still have a soft spot for it lol and since Sidney was Dee's personal student, we're inching closer to that possibility! Fun speculation only perhaps, but there's a ton about this period and the Shakespeare Authorship Question scene - and I know you've only gone over Dee with Green and a Baconian - why not get it done with one fell swoop and our "Group Theory" pitch, because there are SO many writers and candidates that each have a unique piece of the puzzle.
Been a fan long time, hope we can make it work!
<3 Brady
If we have to got back as far as John Dee who "apparently" predicted something, it's more of a confirmation that they are no real medium. You could as well refer to Jacques De Molay who predicted catastrophe on those who condemned him, but predicting the death of someone is not hard if your group is involved in the killing.
I'm more looking at a current time prediction proof, surely with all the attention whores on social networks we should find a reliable medium between the preachers who supposedly speak to God, the new agers connecting with the Pleaiadian, the remote viewers (behind paid walls ;-), or just the millions of astrologers/tarot reader of every kind and yet ... no 911 prediction, no C19 prediction from anybody.
PS : The two best 911 predictions I know of are from Alex Jones (speaking of terrorist attack from Bin Laden a few months before) and Aron Russo (recounting his discussions with a Rockfeller). None of them are medium, just well informed muggles.
